Thursday, October 31, 2013

PHILCONSA v. PEDRO M. GIMENEZ G.R. No. L-23326 December 18, 1965

Facts:
                Philippine Constitution Association, Inc (PHILCONSA) assails the validity of RA 3836 insofar as the same allows retirement gratuity and commutation of vacation and sick leave to Senators and Representatives, and to the elective officials of both Houses (of Congress). The provision on retirement gratuity is an attempt to circumvent the Constitutional ban on increase of salaries of the members of Congress during their term of office, contrary to the provisions of Article VI, Section 14 of the Constitution. The same provision constitutes “selfish class legislation” because it allows members and officers of Congress to retire after twelve (12) years of service and gives them a gratuity equivalent to one year salary for every four years of service, which is not refundable in case of reinstatement or re election of the retiree, while all other officers and employees of the government can retire only after at least twenty (20) years of service and are given a gratuity which is only equivalent to one month salary for every year of service, which, in any case, cannot exceed 24 months. The provision on vacation and sick leave, commutable at the highest rate received, insofar as members of Congress are concerned, is another attempt of the legislator to further increase their compensation in violation of the Constitution.
The Solicitor General counter-argued alleging that the grant of retirement or pension benefits under Republic Act No. 3836 to the officers objected to by the petitioner does not constitute “forbidden compensation” within the meaning of Section 14 of Article VI of the Philippine Constitution. The law in question does not constitute class legislation. The payment of commutable vacation and sick leave benefits under the said Act is merely “in the nature of a basis for computing the gratuity due each retiring member” and, therefore, is not an indirect scheme to increase their salary.
Issue:
                whether Republic Act 3836 violates Section 14, Article VI, of the Constitution which reads as follows:
The senators and the Members of the House of Representatives shall, unless otherwise provided by law, receive an annual compensation of seven thousand two hundred pesos each, including per diems and other emoluments or allowances, and exclusive only of travelling expenses to and from their respective districts in the case of Members of the House of Representative and to and from their places of residence in the case of Senators, when attending sessions of the Congress. No increase in said compensation shall take effect until after the expiration of the full term of all the Members of the Senate and of the House of Representatives approving such increase. Until otherwise provided by law, the President of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives shall each receive an annual compensation of sixteen thousand pesos.
Held:
                Yes. When the Constitutional Convention first determined the compensation for the Members of Congress, the amount fixed by it was only P5,000.00 per annum but it embodies a special proviso which reads as follows: “No increase in said compensation shall take effect until after the expiration of the full term of all the members of the National Assembly elected subsequent to approval of such increase.” In other words, under the original constitutional provision regarding the power of the National Assembly to increase the salaries of its members, no increase would take effect until after the expiration of the full term of the members of the Assembly elected subsequent to the approval of such increase.
The Constitutional provision in the aforementioned Section 14, Article VI, includes in the term compensation “other emoluments”. This is the pivotal point on this fundamental question as to whether the retirement benefit as provided for in Republic Act 3836 fall within the purview of the term “other emoluments.”
Emolument is defined as the profit arising from office or employment; that which is received as compensation for services or which is annexed to the possession of an office, as salary, fees and perquisites.
It is evident that retirement benefit is a form or another species of emolument, because it is a part of compensation for services of one possessing any office.
Republic Act 3836 provides for an increase in the emoluments of Senators and Members of the House of Representatives, to take effect upon the approval of said Act, which was on June 22, 1963. Retirement benefits were immediately available thereunder, without awaiting the expiration of the full term of all the Members of the Senate and the House of Representatives approving such increase. Such provision clearly runs counter to the prohibition in Article VI, Section 14 of the Constitution. RA 3836 is therefore unconstitutional.

4 comments:

  1. Nice post, things explained in details. Thank You.

    ReplyDelete
  2. You should see how my friend Wesley Virgin's tale begins with this shocking and controversial video.

    You see, Wesley was in the military-and shortly after leaving-he unveiled hidden, "MIND CONTROL" tactics that the CIA and others used to get everything they want.

    As it turns out, these are the exact same methods many famous people (especially those who "became famous out of nothing") and top business people used to become rich and successful.

    You've heard that you only use 10% of your brain.

    That's because most of your BRAINPOWER is UNCONSCIOUS.

    Perhaps that thought has even taken place INSIDE your own head... as it did in my good friend Wesley Virgin's head 7 years back, while riding a non-registered, trash bucket of a car with a suspended driver's license and $3.20 in his bank account.

    "I'm absolutely frustrated with going through life paycheck to paycheck! When will I become successful?"

    You took part in those questions, right?

    Your very own success story is waiting to happen. You need to start believing in YOURSELF.

    CLICK HERE TO LEARN WESLEY'S METHOD

    ReplyDelete
  3. As stated by Stanford Medical, It is indeed the one and ONLY reason this country's women get to live 10 years longer and weigh an average of 19 KG less than us.

    (And really, it really has NOTHING to do with genetics or some secret diet and absolutely EVERYTHING related to "HOW" they are eating.)

    BTW, I said "HOW", and not "WHAT"...

    CLICK this link to discover if this little test can help you decipher your real weight loss possibilities

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thank you share your blog, please check condo in las pinas It offers an assortment of homes that can satisfy whatever needs of the homebuyer – regardless of whether it is a family home or a subsequent city home. The wide scope of private alternatives incorporates 12 Italian-roused plan premium homes and 238 all-around planned apartment suite units, situated in one of the most key and lofty areas in the country.

    ReplyDelete

Related Posts with Thumbnails
Thank you for reading!

YOU ARE HERE